|
|
|
Vol. 11, No.
4
|
June, 1974 |
|
|
|
?You Know What? |
|
Dear Bro. Turner:
Reply:
Dear Bro. Turner:
Reply:
|
In principal elders make decisions in the realm of human judgment and expediencies on behalf of the church. They are given this right by (1) scriptures which authorize their place and work, and (2) by the church, in the act of selection and appointment (1TI.3:5; ACT.21:20; 14:23). "Without regard for the members" suggests an arbitrary rule which would be wrong if this is the case (1PE.5:3). A local church cannot be dissolved except by consent of its members-as nothing exists to "dissolve" but their agreement to work and worship together. Taking their property no more dissolves a congregation than burning a house dissolves a home or marriage. Local churches may "merge" by consent of their members with the same authority by which they first formed. Dear Bro. Turner: Please comment on baptismal certificates. "May they read, "in imitation of the example" of our Lord? Reply: Baptism anticipates a new life and "better is the end of a thing than the beginning thereof" (ECC.6:8). There are sound, practical reasons, and perhaps some sentimental reasons, for record keeping; but it is a mistake to encourage a "certificate" sort of Christianity. We should let each day bear testimony to our spiritual growth, and look ahead for opportunity to serve; remembering the death of the "old man" as incentive to keep alive the "new". There is a sense in which Christ’s baptism is exemplar, although this was a special case and impossible to duplicate in detail. We are immersed because the inspired word "baptize" demands that, and the apostles taught it. (ROM.6:4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Created on 8-Dec-00 |
Page last updated |
||