|
 In
1823 Alexander Campbell began publication of the Christian
Baptist. He did more than disseminate information — he
enlarged his influence, and built a “rally point” that
became, to some, the “official organ” for the restoration
movement. But in 1826 B.W. Stone began Christian Messenger,
evidencing a different spirit though having the same basic
attitude toward the Scriptures. Soon many regional papers served
to spread journalistic “influence” — each representing the
distinctive characteristics and understanding of the editors,
and grouping readers accordingly.
In
1856 Ben Franklin began the American Christian Review, saying,
“There is not the least danger of our circulating too many
publications, any more than of our sending out too many
preachers... if they are the right kind.” Perhaps he was
hinting that some thought journalistic influence should be
limited to one or a “few” centers among brethren. Papers
do have this effect. The Gospel Advocate (1855) soon
represented a strong anti-organization, anti- instrumental music
sentiment in the deep south; while the Christian Standard (1866)
promoted the organization and organ in the north. The Firm
Foundation (1884) developed its own sphere of influence in
Texas. There was a time when I could visit with a congregation
for a few hours and tell if it was
|
|
an “Advocate,” “Foundation,” or “Review”
group. The Gospel Guardian effectively represented conservative
thought during the institutional arguments of this century. We
can not reject papers because they wield influence.” On
this basis we would reject churches, preachers — even the “light”
of a Christian (Matt. 5:13-16).
But
sectarian and selfish interest in the promotion of influence is
deplorable — from Campbell to the present time. It likely
stems from three sources: 1) a pride-fed sectarian spirit, 2)
genuine desire to promote truth which seeks to excuse carnal
methods, and/or 3) the need for more and more money. These
motives, and combinations of them, have marred many a
journalistic effort and caused some to overlook the sacrificing
efforts of hard-working publishers and writers who have
faithfully promoted the cause of Christ on the printed page.
There are good, and bad, writers, publishers, preachers, people.
We
like the non-commercial, free-to-the-reader, publication of
scriptural material by various congregations — a part of their
teaching program to the public. We believe such papers have done
much to put the brakes on “official organ” concepts.
[Previous
Article] [Next
Article]
|
