|
When
asked to teach a class "Interpretation of Epistles," I
decided to begin with something non-Biblical, so that
preconceptions and commentaries could not destroy an objective
study. This idea has had a three-year testing, and has worked
well. Maybe some of our readers can use the plan.
I
wrote four short letters, signed "Bob" "Bob
Jones" "Robert L. Jones" and "Bob and Joyce
Jones." One was to a church in Australia; one was advertising
a FLOWER MART in Iowa, one to "Dear Jim" in Kansas, and
one to the Principal of a Kansas school system. The letters were
numbered, but NOT in chronological order; none were dated,
but "clues" were worked into their message. (Example:
"I suppose you have heard the latest threats from Hitler, and
the possibility we may be drawn into this conflict."
"Our 'little Robbie' is now sixteen and preaches here every
other Sunday night.")
The
class was told to study these letters, and (1) arrange them
chronologically, giving approximate date of each; (2) analyze
details (ten specific questions asked); (3) write brief biography
of the writer (Bob Jones); and (4) give citations for Bob's
attitude toward School, Church, etc. A Short quiz was then given
on this material. This takes two class periods.
| |
THEN,
the class is told to consider Philemon, and chapter four of the
Colossian letter in the same objective manner (as two letters from
the same writer) and answer some pointed questions about historic
circumstances. Only when we have milked all information possible
out of these sources do I give them a more complete rundown on the
Life of Paul, other "prison" letters, dates taken from
other sources, etc., and we begin to interpret the spiritual
message in Philemon. For a quiz, students are asked to begin a
short letter, "Dear Phil:" and in their own words ask
him to receive Onesimus — using the arguments and tactics of the
apostle Paul.
Our
next study (Philippians) gets a bit deeper consideration, with
detailed attention given its profound thoughts; and then we move
into a full half-semester study of Galatians.
The
idea is to establish an objective, logical approach to exegesis. We
let Paul make his own points — no preaching or running all
over the Bible to make them for him. It may come as a surprise to
some, but the inspired Apostle does a wonderful job of explaining
himself, if we will let him do it, unhampered by our sermon
outlines. If we wish to hear what God says we must not do all
the talking!
[Previous
Article] [Next
Article]
|