|
The
plea in religious circles to "restore" is an old one.
The "restoration movement" of the Campbell and Stone era
was not new. Others, correctly or otherwise, have felt a need to
"restore," and concepts of restoration can be found in
history as well as among us today.
Joseph
Smith sought a "restoration of the gospel." Based upon
the false premise that the original gospel had been corrupted, (1
Nephi 13:32), he thought it was restored when he gave the Book of
Mormon to men.
Mormons
also want to "restore the church" and thus they vainly
seek to restore the priesthood, prophets, and apostolic office.
These
concepts of restoration are obviously based upon erroneous ideas
and lead away from, rather than to, the truth.
And
there are also some among "us" today who would
"restore." But when appeals are made to Campbell, Stone,
the Declaration and Address, the "restoration
brotherhood," and our "restoration heritage," one
wonders if all some want to restore is the "Restoration
Movement." Others talk in a careless way of "restoring
the New Testament church" and "the proper name."
But
these concepts of restoration, if not carefully clarified, are as
dangerous as the others. A restoration movement with Alexander
Campbell at the center of it is no better than one with Joseph
Smith as the focal point: one makes Campbellites, the
| |
other Mormons, and neither produces Christians.
Those that seek a restoration of "the church" without an
accurate concept of "church" have done us no favor
either. And, "restorations" that are merely outward are
of no benefit: simply changing the name we wear or the sign on the
building does nothing to change the heart.
And
yet, true restoration is needed and can be had. It all
depends. For one thing, the proper concept of restoration
itself needs to be restored. We need to ask ourselves, " What
needs to be restored and how do we go about it?" Ezra knew:
"Ezra set his heart to seek the law of Jehovah, and to do it,
and to teach in Israel statutes and ordinances," (7:10).
Restoring a proper regard in the hearts of men for God's will is
the "what" and teaching is the "how."
Then,
restoration must begin with "us." Appeals to
others to forsake traditions and creeds and to "do it the
first century way" will fall on deaf ears if we are unwilling
to do the same thing, (Rom. 2:1, 21).
"Restore
New Testament Christianity" — what a noble sentiment!
Yet... if we better appreciated what is involved in this, I wonder
if it would really be so attractive.
Brethren,
it just might mean that some drastic changes would have to take
place in our thinking and practices if we did some true
restoration. But, after all, isn't that what restoration is all
about?
David Smitherman
[Previous
Article] [Next
Article]
|