O'Brien in
"Understanding the Catholic Faith." Augustine said,
"I should not believe the gospel except as moved by the
authority of the Church" (Schaff, V.7.)
Are
Roman Catholics the only ones who have such a concept of
"church"? They spell it out for us, but many others
accept the spirit of this error. "The great middle-section of
the church" just couldn't be wrong — or so we are told.
"Baptism is not valid unless one of our preachers baptize
you" says another. "The church must serve the Lord's
Supper,” says another. Somehow many have accepted the idea that
the institution administers blessings instead of being
the ones on whom the Lord bestows blessings.
Have
we truly partaken of the Supper because of who served it, or the
hour or place served; or must we commune with the
Lord? Can a certain preacher make baptism valid for one who
lacks personal faith or dedication? Do we go to "the
church" which in turn goes to the Lord on our behalf; or have
we a direct relationship with the Heavenly Father through Jesus
Christ, our High Priest?
Sacerdotalism
is by no means dead, nor is it confined to the R.C. church. It
pops to the surface in discussion of "exclusive" work of
the church. We certainly believe the church has assigned
functions, but we should be careful in our studies to
differentiate "validating authority" from simply
"doing" as a team, what the Lord authorized all His
followers to do. We are a royal and holy priesthood.