|
|
| Vol. 2, No. 2 |
March, 1965 |
|
|
|
QUERIES and ANSWERS |
| Bro. Turner: What arguments can you offer for the frequency of your partaking of Lord's Supper? Why observe this every week? WT, Mississippi. Reply: I offer three arguments: scripture, reason, and historical precedent. If the first is valid, the others are not really necessary. The early Christians met on every first day of the week. (1 Cor. 16:2) (KATA MIAN, every first day; KATA POLIN, every city; KATA MENA, every month; etc. Acts l5: 2l Rev. 22:2) In 1 Cor. 11:20 Paul censures what these Corinthians did "when ye come together (every first day, 16:2) and explains what they should do, viz., partake of the Lord's Supper. (vs. 23) It's a "left-handed" argument, but it is clear and strong. (See ARV) Acts 20:7 says the disciples met upon the first day of the week to break bread. "The" is definite article, expressive of a stated or fixed day. There is certainly no authority for the L. S. on any other day. Further, here is equal authority for the L. S. on each and every "first day that rolls around. (Examples "Remember the Sabbath---" Ex. 20:8. WHICH Sabbath Day? The Jews had no difficulty in recognizing that this was authority for every 7th. Day that came.) These are scriptural arguments which I hold to be sound. |
Reasonable evidence is found in the fact that all commemorative institutions which
God ordained in prior times (Law of Moses) had a fixed and regular time for observance. (The Passover, Feast of
Tabernacles, Purim, Pentecost, etc.) If the Lord's Supper is not to be observed every first day there is no way
to determine a fixed time (with divine authority) and this vital memorial (1 Cor. 11:23-f.) is left to wander aimlessly. ----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Created on 10-Mar-00 |
Page last updated |
||